Principles for living
Duty: keeping what was agreed
In shortKeeping what was agreed makes the family predictable, and gives the child a place in it.
The idea
Keeping a duty makes us predictable to others and to ourselves. When a child knows that every day they lay the table, that Dad does what he says and that the family counts on them, the world becomes more certain and they have a place in it. Marcus Aurelius wrote that each of us has a part to play. A small, well-chosen duty gives structure, a sense of being useful and daily evidence that one’s actions count.
What to try
- Give the child a small, regular duty that is useful to others (laying the table, feeding the cat).
- Keep your side of what you agree with them too: duty belongs to everyone.
- Thank them for a duty done by naming what it did for others, not with prizes.
The common mistake
Using duty as a punishment, or giving duties that nobody notices being done.
Want to know more?
Start here
Short, plain pieces by the researchers and good writers.
Books
How the predictive brain shapes what we see, feel and do, with many everyday examples.
See on Amazon ›Amazon links are affiliate links: if you buy, Bounded Uncertainty receives a small commission at no cost to you.
The science behind itHow strong the evidence is, the model, videos and references.
How strong the evidence is
A way of thinking A lens for interpreting what a child does, not a rule from trials.
Commitments and promises work as self-fulfilling predictions: by announcing an action, an agent makes it more likely for itself and for others, and lets others plan around it. In active inference, shared expectations about roles and norms reduce joint uncertainty and allow coordination (Veissière et al., 2020). Ainslie (2001) describes how bundling choices into personal rules (‘I am someone who…’) protects against short-term preferences. For children, regular and useful duties give contingent feedback (the action changes something for others), which relates to confidence in action (see ‘When acting seems not to work’).
References
- Ainslie, G. (2001). Breakdown of Will. Cambridge University Press.
- Veissière, S. P. L., Constant, A., Ramstead, M. J. D., Friston, K. J., & Kirmayer, L. J. (2020). Thinking through other minds: A variational approach to cognition and culture. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 43, e90.
- Marcus Aurelius (c. 170/2006). Meditations (M. Hammond, Trans.). Penguin.
Found this useful? Buy Ricardo a coffee